검색 결과

너무 길이서 다 읽어볼 수 없고 이것도 대충 읽어보면 Defender가 그렇게 좋진 못한듯 합니다.. 뭐 적어도 랜섬웨어 방어에서는!! Kaspersky vs Windows Defender: Test vs Malware and Ransomware with 600+ Malware Links. Do you need a 3rd party antivirus or stick to windows defender? This video should highlight some of the differences. Kaspersky is one of the members of our annual Mal X programme so they receive additional test reports and data from us. However, all public tests are conducted fully independently with no interference. hello and welcome to the PC security 0:02 Channel as you can see for this test we 0:04 have two VMS side by side on the left we 0:07 have Windows Defender set up and ready 0:09 to go on the right we have Kaspersky 0:11 standard a well-known third-party AV 0:13 we're going to test both these systems 0:16 against an array of malware directly 0:18 from the source we have automation 0:20 scripts that are going to visit hundreds 0:23 of malware websites and we're going to 0:25 see what the user experience looks like 0:27 on both systems as that's happening so 0:29 without further Ado let's get started 0:31 and We're Off to the Races the first 0:33 test is underway as you can see both 0:35 products are blocking threats we're 0:38 seeing alerts from both Windows Defender 0:40 and Kaspersky now while this is running 0:42 I just want to mention a couple of 0:44 things about the environment so settings 0:46 wise everything is turned on for Windows 0:49 Defender that includes blocking 0:51 potentially unwanted programs blocking 0:54 suspicious apps app and browser control 0:56 as you can see is turned on on the side 0:58 of Kaspersky it's pretty much the same 1:00 so we have blocking of potentially 1:02 malicious tools now already we've got a 1:06 few differences between the products so 1:07 Kaspersky of course has a different 1:10 reporting mechanism it's deleting 1:12 objects in real time and telling us 1:14 exactly which file is affected whereas 1:16 with Windows we just see across and then 1:19 some notifications about malware being 1:21 detected and then we have to click on 1:25 view details to see exactly what the 1:28 malware is by the way if you're noticing 1:30 the numbers on the left for links not 1:34 particularly synchronized that's because 1:36 we're running this multi-threaded so 1:38 we're starting multiple downloads at the 1:40 same time some of them may finish 1:42 earlier some of them may finish later 1:44 and that's why the numbers may not be 1:46 sequential but that's totally fine the 1:48 test is running as expected also worth 1:50 noting that Kaspersky of course has a 1:53 lot more granularity in its settings and 1:56 things that you can modify within the 1:58 fall antivirus system 1:59 that's one of the differences between 2:01 Windows Defender and some third-party 2:04 AVS is that Windows Defender is still a 2:07 bit Limited in terms of the UI another 2:09 thing worth noting is that in the case 2:11 of Kaspersky did see some web alerts in 2:13 the case of links directly being blocked 2:16 as we're trying to visit them I didn't 2:18 see anything similar with Windows 2:19 Defender but we're gonna find out 2:21 because the script does detect if a 2:23 download is blocked directly we are 2:25 going to see those numbers once the task 2:27 is complete now in the case of Kaspersky 2:30 we have few threats that still need to 2:32 be resolved apply to all delete and that 2:35 should take care of that I'm gonna do 2:37 the same for everything else also a 2:39 quick disclaimer while the tests are 2:40 running Kaspersky is a member of our 2:43 malix program which means they receive 2:45 additional reports and test data from us 2:48 however every public test you see is 2:51 always conducted independently and 2:53 there's no interference from anybody in 2:55 fact even I have no idea what's going to 2:57 happen here interestingly both tests 2:59 seem to finish at pretty much exactly 3:02 the same time we visited 670 URLs I 3:06 believe the threshold was a thousand but 3:08 of course we're only visiting URLs that 3:11 are going to give us an exe download 3:13 Kaspersky has blocked 2.09 percent of 3:17 links Windows 0.45 that's only counting 3:20 links that just could not be downloaded 3:22 directly so I did expect it to be low in 3:26 the case of Windows Defender as you can 3:28 see some pups are found so we do have 3:31 that setting enabled we're trying to 3:33 resolve them but it is a bit slow to 3:35 respond as you can see in the case of 3:37 Kaspersky everything seems to be already 3:39 resolved another thing worth noting is 3:42 the final number of files we were able 3:44 to successfully download so on the right 3:47 we have 79 files remaining we're still 3:50 waiting for the numbers on Windows 3:51 Defender side because Windows Defender 3:53 is still actively removing threats 3:56 and this brings us to one of the issues 3:59 here so as you can see Windows Defender 4:01 UI does start to get very glitchy when 4:04 you run out of space in terms of the 4:06 threats being reported and I just feel 4:09 like this should be resolved in a 4:12 product that's part of the OS like 4:14 surely we can get a number of threats 4:17 detected and a better UI to see the 4:20 different details and you know not this 4:23 buggy mess of a flashing screen and then 4:26 iterating over and over again I mean 4:29 just look at it I'm trying to resolve 4:31 these threats I'm clicking on start 4:32 actions 4:34 for a moment it says feel free to 4:37 continue using your system nothing to 4:39 worry about and then a few moments later 4:41 the screen starts flashing and we're 4:43 seeing threats again and despite me 4:46 um several times clicking on remove on 4:48 this file it's just not resolved it 4:51 would also be a bit unnerving as a user 4:53 if this was my main system and I was 4:56 actually worried about the malware and 4:58 that's the second time I'm clicking on 5:00 remove for the pup I guess part of it is 5:03 also that Windows Defender is slow in 5:06 dealing with these threats and it's not 5:08 able to report effectively while it's in 5:11 the process of removal but anyway we're 5:13 gonna give it its time and we'll see 5:16 and fondly now just the UI just crashes 5:20 if we take a look at the folders now 5:22 we've got over 300 files still on the 5:25 Windows Defender side 79 on side of 5:27 Kaspersky but of course Windows Defender 5:29 is still removing stuff and finally 5:32 we've got the numbers for Windows 5:34 Defender and it seems it removed 476 5:37 with 138 remaining while I say that if 5:40 you look at the folder there are 122 5:43 items so it does seem like Windows 5:44 Defender removed a few more and we're 5:46 still getting alerts so perhaps even 5:49 though our script thinks it is complete 5:52 it looks like Windows Defender is still 5:54 removing threats screen is still 5:56 flashing so I'm just going to give it 5:58 some more time Meanwhile we're gonna do 6:00 a false scan on the side of Kaspersky 6:02 we're also going to do the same with 6:04 Windows Defender when it's complete just 6:06 to make sure there are no additional 6:07 threats that either of these products 6:09 detects it looks like Kaspersky has 6:12 deleted two additional objects 6:13 interestingly it seems like we've got 37 6:17 items left once Windows Defenders 6:19 finally done removing items we're also 6:22 going to do a scan like we did in the 6:23 case of Kaspersky to see if there are 6:25 any additional items that are detected 6:27 but already that's very interesting to 6:29 see that Windows Defender actually ends 6:31 up with a lower number in the end even 6:32 though it's much slower to get there 6:34 seems like we're finally done removing 6:36 threats even though it's hard to say 6:38 with this UI and it's crashed again 6:42 I've clicked the button as many times as 6:44 humanly possible and we're still left 6:46 with 37 items nothing else is being 6:48 removed so I think we're just gonna call 6:50 it day here now we're also going to 6:52 automate the execution of all of these 6:54 faults on both these systems and then 6:56 we're going to some scans with Hitman 6:58 Pro second opinion scanner to see what 7:00 gets through 7:02 [Applause] 7:07 [Music] 7:09 all right we're back we've executed the 7:12 malware reset the system and now we're 7:15 doing our second opinion scans as you 7:16 can see multiple things were installed 7:18 we're seeing new icons on desktop in the 7:21 case of Kaspersky I did see a joke 7:23 malware execute will be interesting to 7:25 see if it's actually malicious if it 7:28 persists and does something with the 7:29 system because there were some annoying 7:31 pop-ups while the test was running but 7:33 if it's just joke malware maybe it just 7:35 goes away on restart the scans are now 7:37 complete and interestingly we've got 7:39 some malware detections on the side of 7:41 Kaspersky but a couple of them are in a 7:44 temp folder and the third one seems like 7:47 an uninstaller of a pup so the uninstall 7:51 program itself is detected in the case 7:53 of Windows Defender we've got a lot of 7:56 registry keys remnants from re-image 7:59 repair so nothing really serious in 8:01 either case even though we have quite a 8:04 few applications installed not a lot of 8:06 them were detected by Hitman Pro either 8:08 in both cases we have coin Surf and 8:10 chrominus icons on desktop couple more 8:13 icons in the case of Kaspersky again I 8:16 don't really see anything serious in 8:19 either case unless the uninstall.exe is 8:22 a fake Trojan or something like that 8:24 which is the only file we have outside 8:26 of tem files 8:28 so we're just gonna explore it and then 8:30 visit the folder run the uninstall.exe 8:33 program 8:34 see if it does something other than 8:36 uninstall oh we've got an eraser and it 8:38 just removed itself so that is 8:41 definitely a false positive that's what 8:43 it looks like because it seems to be an 8:45 actual uninstaller of the program so 8:49 nothing really on the side of Kaspersky 8:51 either other than a couple of temp files 8:53 it's a good result for both products but 8:56 I hope that going through the test in 8:58 this way showed you some of the 9:00 differences and how they function but I 9:02 have to say Windows Defender detecting 9:04 as many pups as it did was definitely a 9:06 surprise for me good to see that it has 9:08 improved on that front now we're going 9:10 to move on to the next part of the test 9:12 which is going to be the ransomware test 9:15 and in this case we have 74 Infamous 9:19 ransomware samples from The Last Five 9:21 Years these are serious threats that are 9:23 going to encrypt our data if given the 9:25 chance we're going to execute them from 9:28 a network directory as we always do 9:30 that's what the dash n is for and we're 9:32 going to see which system is less 9:34 affected so once again we're going to 9:36 run the script on both the systems 9:38 threats are already being blocked 9:41 interestingly in the case of Windows 9:43 Defender we already have ransomware 9:45 taking over the screen we've got app 9:47 Society ransomware we've got something 9:49 else happening on the desktop as well 9:52 that's a little bit concerning 9:54 got some errors popping up you can see 9:56 the proactive detection on the case of 9:58 Kaspersky which is just finished is 100 10:01 case of Windows Defender oh we've got 10:05 black claw running at the moment 10:07 gonna try to shut this down so we can 10:10 look at our script we've got a proactive 10:12 detection of about 92 percent which 10:14 means some faults are being allowed to 10:16 execute we are still seeing the prompt 10:19 ransomware is being found Windows 10:20 Defender is trying to deal with it but 10:22 unfortunately it's not dealing with all 10:24 of them and we've already got some 10:26 Ransom notes on the desktop test is now 10:28 complete as you can see we've got 10:31 five misses that may not seem like a lot 10:34 but even missing one ransomware could 10:36 lead to your Falls being encrypted and 10:39 in this case our faults are indeed 10:42 encrypted by black claw if we take a 10:45 look at the documents inside of 10:47 Kaspersky our faults seem to be all 10:49 right 10:51 if you open up a text file you can see 10:54 the difference between an encrypted file 10:57 and a non-encrypted file as you can see 10:59 you can read the play on the right the 11:01 great works of Shakespeare and on the 11:03 left we have them translated into God 11:06 knows what language 11:07 just kidding that's what encrypted text 11:10 looks like 11:11 and unfortunately in the case of Windows 11:13 Defender our data is encrypted and 11:15 non-recoverable now many of these are 11:17 well-known threats so I would have 11:19 expected Windows Defender to know about 11:21 them to be able to block them but I 11:23 think part of the reason it doesn't do 11:25 very well in these ransomware tests is 11:27 also the way it functions because a lot 11:29 of the time it is sending data to the 11:32 cloud waiting for analysis before it can 11:34 make a decision on the machine and when 11:36 it comes to complex malware that 11:38 executes really fast Windows Defender 11:40 just probably fails to track them the 11:42 reason I say that is because again I've 11:44 seen inconsistent results in this part 11:47 of the test they've been times where 11:48 I've run it where it's detected more 11:50 it's detected less it's also worth 11:52 noting from some of our previous tests 11:55 that the detection ratio with Windows 11:57 Defender gets much worse if you disable 11:59 the internet whereas with Kaspersky you 12:02 can disable the internet you can even 12:04 turn off most of the signature component 12:06 and as long as you just have the system 12:08 Watcher component enabled it is still 12:10 able to at least prevent your data from 12:12 being encrypted I'm not going to rerun 12:14 that test right now because even with 12:16 the internet turned on as you can see 12:18 we've got data encrypted in one side so 12:21 it would feel like beating a dead horse 12:22 but I will link the other tests in the 12:24 description where you can see that 12:26 happening another thing worth noting in 12:28 the case of Windows Defender you have 12:30 controlled folder access which I would 12:33 highly recommend using if you do use it 12:35 because that is one way to at least 12:37 control the damage that can be done by 12:39 ransomware by protecting some of your 12:41 most important folders but of course 12:42 it's not ideal because you can't protect 12:45 all your folders and if you do other 12:47 applications can't access them either so 12:49 I hope you enjoyed this video hope you 12:51 found these results interesting and 12:53 insightful a lot of these tests are 12:55 surprising to me as well because I have 12:58 no idea what's going to happen going 12:59 into them but we will be doing more of 13:01 them in the future so make sure you're 13:03 subscribed if you want to see that 13:05 please like and share the video If you 13:06 enjoyed it of course if you have any 13:08 questions or comments feel free to post 13:10 them down below below I do read all the 13:12 comments I get thank you all so much for 13:15 watching this is Leo and as always stay 13:18 informed stay secure and happy New Year 13:21 everyone

외게인이 날 납치해서 잘 쌩기고 므~~찐 핸썸가이로 만들어줘쓰믄.. 우리도 외계인 고문시켰자녀

구성품 손바닥에 잡히는 면적이 좁아지고 컴팩트해짐 손바닥의 부담이 적어짐 표면 재질은 동일 원래 로지텍 다중 버튼 마우스 사이드 버튼은 좌측 3s 우측 2s. 1s는 3s처럼 측면 버튼이 아래에 있음. 1s->2s->3s 이렇게 변화 아닌 변화가 옴. 그냥 시리즈 늘이고 가격 높이고. 다른 점은 dpi 해상도가 높아짐. 8000dpi 확장하고 3600dpi로 설정했는데 포인터가 엄청 빨라서 오래 적응이 잘 된 사람 제외하고는 사실 제어가 불가능한 속도. 3600이나 고속에 맞춰서 쓰는 사람도 희박하고. 이 정도만 해도 낮은 모니터 해상도에선 능력자 제외하면 쓸수가 없음. 4K화면 크기는 되야 이런 속도가 필요하고 그것도 엄청 빠르기 때문에 아무나 제어할 수 없음. 그래서 숫자만 중요시 하는 하드웨어 쟁이는 사실 실속 없는 생각을 많이 함. 고 스캔 해상도라 좁은 범위에서 포인터 움직이 부드럽고 좋음 덜 어색함. 마우스 피트 우측 2s변경 저렇게 넓은 마우스 피트는 오히려 저항감 때문에 좋지 못함. 앞에쪽 마우스 피트도 넓어져서 움직임이 소프트해짐 긍정적. 3s 무소음은 아니고 초저소음이라 공공장소에서 쓰기가 좋음 하지만 전혀 소음이 없는 게 아니라 칸막이 독서실에서는 무리가 있을 수 있음. 스크롤버튼 역시 거의 소음이 없고 매우 부드러움. 좌우 버튼 클릭 소리나 감은 역시나 좌우가 미세하게 다름. 클릭감 매우 소프트하고 정말 좋음. 그립감도 좋음. 서양 체구에 맞는 거라 남성에게도 큰 느낌이 들수 있고 동양 여자에겐 너무 클수 밖엔 없음. 박스에 한자 적혀있으면 해외수입, 한국 정식 유통은 한글 쓰여져 있음. 2s 5년 정도 사용, 외부 케이스 하우징이라고하는데 약간 고무 재질이고 닳기 쉬운데 5년을 써도 지금 당장 다이소 등 만능클리너 같은 청소 티슈 쓰면 엄청 깨끗해짐. 3s는 휠버튼에 미끄럼방지 고무패드 사라짐. 휠 매우 부드러우나 가운데버튼 클릭감은 다소 무거움(좀 부드러워지려면 시간이 꽤나 지나야함. 국내정식유통품과는 4만원 차이고 국내정발은 무상 AS1년, 수입은 유통사문의 필요 보통 없음. 단점은 역시나 측면 하단 2개 버튼이 엄지손가락 길이 개인차로 거리감이 멀수가 있음 가운데 버튼은 왜 이렇게 딱! 딱! 소음이 박력 넘치는 지 불량인가 싶을 정도. 말짱 황도루묵을 만들어놨음 까페 같은데서도 못써 너무 딱딱거려가지고 4s에서는 이거 수정해서 가격 높인다. 일본놈 뺨 후려치는 상술

https://smartstore.naver.com/gyp7875/products/8386529168

우드필러 (우드퍼티) 이걸로 매꿀 수는 있는데 피스를 고정시킬 정도 인지는 확인이 어려움, 나무 젖가락으로 적당히 매꾸고 나머지 공간은 퍼티로 매꾼 다음에 순간 접착제를 침투시켜서 단단하게 만든다. 다이소에 VTEC 제품이 있는데 아직 사용해보진 않았고 일반적으로 매꿈용 인테리어용이다. 퍼티 성분은 나무 섬유질이 포함되어 있다고한다. https://smartstore.naver.com/osanwood/products/4754468685

모욕 고소장 제출한 상태고, 정리해서 추가 제출합니다. 2차 명예훼손죄로 고소 예정되어있습니다.

충전 불가.. 모터 고장은 아니고.. 배터리는 이렇게 단자가 아예 붙어서 떼어내는 게 불가하고 이런 배터리도 없고.. 억지로 단자 떼어내서 다르게 붙이더라도 배터리 사고 택배비 주고 수리하고 이러느니 그냥 알리에서 하나 사기로.. 수리 가치가 없음.

차나 소형 버스 지나가면 45db~50db 인데 오토바이는 지나가면 최소 50db 55까지 쉽게 찍는다 0은 미측치 일반 25db~30db 사람 등 일본 소음 35~40db 맨 하단 외부 샤시 닫고 차가 지나갔을 때 수치 에어컨 실외기 50~65db 작은 방에서 아주 크게 음악 틀었을 때 70~80db 좀 보통 내지 조금 높였을 때 40~70db 평균 60db정도 음악은 특히 클래식은 워낙 폭이 크고 다양해서 평균 최소 값 어려움

남부경찰서 수사6팀 지성구 쟤가 불안감조성죄지 어케 내가? 그리고 그게 맞지도 않는데 검찰이... 이건 내 주장이지만 그건 갈취야 갈취 애초에 내 사적 물건에 대해서 묻지 말아야했어 그리고 사적 질문과 인격 공격적 발언과 행동 등. 녹취는 내가 가지고 있다. 그리고 담당관 말 바꿔치기는 뭐지? 니가 맡았던 내 사건이 울산남구경찰서로 간 건 알지? 우연히야 아님 유목적적이야? 과잉수사는 적어도 인정해야할 거다. 너 자신도 그렇게 생각하는 것 쯤은 난 알 수 있지. 그리고 검찰 형인지 동생인지 아저씬지 모르겠고 정치성향 그런 거 모르겠고 아무리 맞아도 결과 부터 내놓고 할말하라는 것도 법인가? 뭔 그런 절차 다 있어? 그냥 대표로 한명 보내서 총으로 쏴 죽이세요 난 약먹고 자살시도 해봤었는데 안 되더라 그냥 총으로 쏴죽여달라

누구냐고 물어보니 자기도 누군 지 모른 다면 서 울더라 생각 좀 해보자 모르는 사람을 어떻게 대하니? 지 맘대로 할 거면 그냥 날 자살 시키던가 아님 날 강제로 총살 하던가 뭔가 죽인다던가 (내피셜) SLR클럽 너무 심하지 않냐? 그게 누구 거냐

아래는 모두 개딸 상대로 낸 형사 고소건에 관한 내용입니다. 검찰청으로 부터 받은 수사내역을 받아 보니 울산으로 직접 보낸 추가 중요 증거자료는 통째로 증발했습니다. 결정서 내용 엉터리 수사 그리고 담당 형사 자신이 보내라고 해놓고 빠트린건 고의로 밖엔 보이지 않습니다. 검찰청으로 부터 자료를 받을 때 '불송치 결정서' 누락 부터 이상하다고 생각했습니다. 이 건이 바로 공개게시물을 1:1쪽지에 불과하다며 불송치 결정 내린 엉터리 수사입니다. 나머지 3개 불송치경정 형사 고소건 결정서 내용도 상당히 이상합니다. 모든 수사가 개판입니다. 본인의 신상이 드러나고 심각한 허위사실도 단순히 기분 나쁜 말로 치부해 모두 사건을 뭉개버렸습니다. 경찰이 이렇게 엉터리, 허위, 무마, 누락 수사를 하는데도 단순 중재 제외, 국가는 아무 것도 할 수 없는 건가요? 모두 중요 증거자료 역시 통째로 증발했을 가능성이 높다고 보고있습니다. 도움 주실 변호사님, gamchae79@gmail.com (mailto:gamchae79@gmail.com)으로 연락주세요! 모욕 및 부실수사 의뢰합니다! 1:1대화가 아님 : 부산남부 사건번호 2023-6008 / 울산남부 사건번호 2023-008048 특정성 없음 : 부산남부 사건번호 2023-003788 특정성 없음 : 부산남부 사건번호 2023-6008 / 2023-008048 공정수사 바랍니다! 명예훼손 고소건 부산남부 2023-10544 모욕 고소건 부산남부 2023-7232 #모욕 #명예훼손 #변호사 #선임